A Congressman’s Light Bulb Moment

lorraine-scanni-guest-blogger*** By Guest Blogger Lorraine Scanni ***

As the leader of the Staten Island New York Tea Party I have penned many editorial letters and just recently dashed one off to the local liberal propaganda rag that calls itself a newspaper. This letter comes with an interesting back story and an epilogue that I will share with you momentarily. First, the letter:

To the Editor:

In a recent Tom Wrobleski “Strictly Political” column, Congressman McMahon stated that based on meetings with Tea Party members and others, and by listening to his constituents at the Town Hall meeting, “What was very clear . . . and what I didn’t realize, is that there is a feeling that the government is too big. . .”

Really, Congressman?

That same day, an article appeared entitled “Not a Very Bright Idea.” It discusses energy legislation which mandates that as of 2012, incandescent light bulbs will be banned in the U.S. in favor of “environmentally friendly” compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFL’s). While I do not begrudge someone the option to “choose” CFL’s, why is the government involved in this at all? Especially given that, as stated in the article, CFL’s cost more to produce, the light’s not as bright, the bulbs don’t fit many older lamps, are dangerous to dispose of, and provide no significant pay-off environmentally?

It’s just another example of big government intruding into our homes and lives.

Congressman, let’s not pretend that you don’t know what I’m talking about here – you know the government is excessively intrusive and expensive.

In the meantime, I’m stocking up on incandescent bulbs.

Lorraine Scanni

Now for the back story.

On a Friday in early October before he relented to finally have that much feared town hall, Congressman McMahon invited me to his office to participate in a conference on health care. Frank Santarpia and I called in the big guns (a doctor, a lawyer, a Wall Street banker, a plumber emeritus) and the six of us marched into the office and sat across a marble conference table from a gaggle of the best the Left has to offer: representatives from the SEIU, Organizing for America, MoveOn.org, the Working Families Party and a plain old Democrat. We discovered later that a couple of these “representatives” were plants who did not even live in the district. Up until that day I had never been in such close physical proximity to the enemy.

For two and a half hours we sat in that conference room and pounded away at each other with only small foam cups of water available upon request, while our Congressman, to his credit, sat back and just took it all in.  He asked pertinent questions of both sides, agreed on some points with us and agreed on some points with the other side. He laid the ground rules at the beginning – no personal attacks, though the folks on the other side of the table had a really hard time sticking to that rule.

I can’t quite recall when during the debate they threw the first pitch on this but one of them compared the right to government run health care and the use of taxpayer money for thus as the same as the sanitation department picking up your garbage.  After all, they argued, it is a case of “ensuring the general welfare”.  They all agreed in unison – yes, yes, good point!  Someone in our group - it might have been me - pointed out that while being a sanitation worker is an honest way to make a living, they also leave a litter of mess behind them as they go about their business of picking up our trash.

Eerie silence from the other side.

At the conclusion of the meeting we made it crystal clear to our Congressman:  no where in the Constitution is the government authorized to mandate the purchase of a service, government is a huge and intrusive enough, everything the government touches turns to crap, and the Socialist agenda coming out of DC is marching us towards the cliff and we are about to over.

It shocked me that a Congressman needed to hear these words but apparently he did because he asked us on more than one occasion to repeat these sentiments.

Now for the epilogue. Here’s a video of Congressman McMahon’s October town hall meeting:

The Sunday after the raucous town hall, I perused the web site of the local liberal rag to see what kind of spin the lefties would try to put on an event that clearly failed to portray Congressman McMahon in a positive light. There I found Tom Wrobleski’s blog and was struck by this quote from McMahon:

“What was very clear,” he said, “and what I didn’t realize, is that there’s a feeling that government is too big. It’s not Democrat versus Republican. It transcends party affiliation. Some of them are just as mad a George Bush as they are at Obama. There’s a very anti-, negative feeling about government.”

He didn’t realize this before we met with him?  He didn’t realize this before he got shouted down at the town hall?  An elected official stating he was shocked that regular folk may have a feeling that government was too big?

I guess you could say it was his light bulb moment.

That same day I came across the piece titled “Not a Very Bright Idea” describing energy legislation mandating the banning of incandescent light bulbs in favor of “environmentally friendly” compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFL’s) by the year 2012. A couple of weeks later my response was published and it appears to have caused quite a stir!

I heard recently through the grapevine from more than a few people that the letter really struck a nerve with my Congressman, who apparently believes the point I was trying to make involved only light bulbs. He even remarked to someone that I was a little unhinged because of the last sentence of my letter, in which I refer to stocking up on light bulbs.  But no, it’s not about the light bulbs, Congressman.  It’s about the government creeping into our homes.  It’s about the expansion of the nanny-state.  It’s about freedom to choose.  It’s about the irrationality of banning light bulbs to save the planet.

My husband - known to friends and family as “McGyver” - starting purchasing them this summer.  Every time he goes to the store to buy even a gallon of milk, he buys a 4 pack of 75 watt light bulbs, which are now neatly stacked on a shelf in his basement tool room.  Last count was 642 bulbs.  On principle alone he refuses to purchase a CFL and I agree with him completely.

This is how we are fighting the battle in my house…me on the front lines and my husband behind the scenes, strengthening the fortress.

Tweet This Post!

21 Comments

  1. Mmmmmm….

    Very interesting stuff, Lorraine. Many light bulb moments available for all the lefties.

    Good job!

  2. Good for you, Lorraine! We had decided not to buy any CLFs either, but when we had to replace a light fixture, guess what—the incandescent bulbs WON’T fit, only CFLs!

    So I guess we need to scarf up every old light fixture, too. Garage sales, here we come….

  3. So I guess we need to scarf up every old light fixture, too. Garage sales, here we come….

    PiccoloKate on December 19, 2009 at 12:26 pm

    Thanks, PK. Bulbs and fixtures, it is.

  4. BTW, how can a “representative” represent anybody when they do such a masterful job insulating themselves from the represented?

  5. Excellent column, Lorraine!

    And yes, the Staten Island Tea Party is responsible for the very real HEAT applied to Rep. Michael McMahon’s behind.

    Keep up the good work, my friend.

    Virginia Ross on December 19, 2009 at 2:56 PM
  6. I am fully-prepared to protest the mandatory insurance provision of the healthcare. They can fine me, I won’t pay, and they can try to find me. If arrested, I will make sure it goes to the SCOTUS.

    Just gimme a CRUSADE! I dare you!

  7. Sapwolf,

    Pack a clean pair…

  8. I think I’ll move to Amish country. They still use candles don’t they?

    Nice work, Lorraine.

  9. I think I’ll move to Amish country. They still use candles don’t they?

    That started an interesting train of thought, Charlotte. Candles, flashlights and batteries, and going back to living by the sun’s movements: up at dawn, bed or firelight at dusk.

    Actually, I’m not being facetious.

  10. Actually, I’m not being facetious.
    Mary on December 19, 2009 at 10:02 pm

    At the rate the government is entering our complicated lifestyles, a back-to-basics lifestyle in a cabin out in the middle of nowhere would be nirvana.

    I’d rather get eaten alive by a bear than Uncle Sam.

  11. At the rate the government is entering our complicated lifestyles, a back-to-basics lifestyle in a cabin out in the middle of nowhere would be nirvana.

    See what this stirs up:

    If our lives weren’t so “complicated” (technology, etc.) would government intrusion be as bad/pervasive????

  12. Mary on December 19, 2009 at 10:52 pm

    That’s a packed question.

    Take a glance back in history. When the first revolution was underway, people had a very simple lifestyle and yet the intrusion they felt inspired said revolution.

    So…. I would venture to say that by nature we just want to be free, no matter what our lifestyles.

    In this day and age we’ve created more areas for the gov to stick their nose into but even if we took away the “niceties”the government would find a way to intrude.

    Maybe my nirvana is an illusion. No matter how little we have, the gov would figure out a way to get all up in it.

    I’m gonna unpack my survival kit now, and cancel my date with the bush pilot. *sigh*

  13. I’m gonna unpack my survival kit now, and cancel my date with the bush pilot. *sigh*

    Don’t completely unpack your survival kit, but you can lose the bush pilot. We’ll need to survive wherever we are. (Especially since we are stuck here in California, aka “cloud-cuckoo-land”.)

  14. We’ll need to survive wherever we are.

    Too true.

  15. I’m gonna unpack my survival kit now, and cancel my date with the bush pilot. *sigh*

    ;)

  16. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, maybe we can start our “own” religion. One that abhors the “public option” obamacare legislation. Like the Amish we can then become concientious objectors and invoke the dems favorite — the Church/State separation — clause…

  17. Great narrative telling all how it is. It is a plus having citizens like yourself mounting Paul Revere’s horse. Keep up the good work. Tony toy

  18. I have a new name for my cuz, “Pit Bull”. She latches on and won’t give up. Keep up the excellent work Lorraine. Next election should be “Vote for someone who truly cares, Vote for Lorraine “Pit Bull” Scanni.

  19. My dear Lorraine. Don’t you know what is wrong with this blog? You make too much sense!!!!!!!!!

    Linda

  20. Gohawgs on December 20, 2009 at 12:06 am

    Don’t make me go there, Gohawgs!

  21. Charlotte on December 21, 2009 at 12:14 am

    WHO???? ME!!!

BLOGADS

Blog advertise on Manly's Republic and advertise to the world.

For additional information on sponsorship on Manly's Republic please contact manly@manlyrash.com